If the Democrats don’t understand inflation, they will after November 8

Let’s say in the past few weeks, American universities have become so saturated with awakened politics that they have forgotten how to teach basic economics, or that Democrats haven’t bothered to take those lessons (or both). This is the only rationale to explain why policy makers show ignorance and inconsistency on the biggest issue facing American families.

But if people in Washington don’t understand, or care, when parents are crushed by skyrocketing food and gas bills, they may do so after November 8th. Distracting voters of all stripes from Democrats in a group.

Congress is clueless

Politico started last article With an anecdote where Left Rep. Katie Porter of California tried to teach fellow Democrats about inflation, and they seemed to respond as if she was from Mars:

Only after Representative Katie Porter put bacon in her cart at a local grocery store recently did she notice that its price had risen to $9.99 a pound. Reluctantly, she returned the parcel.

It was a dose of reality long understood by Porter, a progressive single mom in California and a mother of three. But she is not sure that all of her fellow Democrats share her interest in connecting with the experiences of ordinary Americans outside the Beltway.

When Porter delivered an emotional speech about how inflation has affected her family for months during a special Democratic Congressional meeting in the House of Representatives last week, she said it seemed like the first time the personal toll on high consumer prices had decreased for some lawmakers in the room. .

This story sounds shocking, but it’s not entirely surprising. Members of Congress earn $174,000 annually, with (IllegallySubsidized health coverage and other benefits that many ordinary working Americans don’t get. This amount of annual household income is more than three times the average income in the United States. So why would the average member of Congress know, let alone care, whether bacon costs $3.99 or $9.99 a pound?

Professor Policy Seminars

While some congressional offices express indifference to the plight of American families, others have apparently resorted to lecturing voters. same politico Article – Commodity She offered this anecdote from Capitol Hill: “One Democratic House in the House received so many calls from a voter complaining about the cost of bacon that she was tied to a political aide to talk about why it had suddenly gone up. But the woman had little interest in understanding the effects of incorporating meat. Instead, she simply urged the legislator’s office to lower the price.”

Memo for Washington: When families start banging their teeth the proverbial they go to the grocery store every week, they don’t want lectures about how “evil” pork producers make “excessive” profits. Or to put it more simply, looking for a scapegoat will not solve the actual problem.

Biden administration disharmony

Into this breach stepped President Biden – whose tongue was soon tied. President chirp: Do you want to reduce inflation? Let’s make sure the wealthiest companies pay their fair share.”

Perhaps not surprisingly, Biden has proclaimed a “solution” to inflation, precisely the policies he has promoted since he began running for president. But given that most studies indicate that some part From corporate tax increases being passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices or lower wages, Biden’s “reform” would actually exacerbate inflationary pressure on families.

In her first formal press conference as White House press secretary, Karen Jean-Pierre was asked how Biden’s proposal to raise corporate taxes would ease inflation. Suffice it to say that a file The word salad that followed It should not inspire confidence in the competence of this administration and its knowledge of economic policy:

Q: But how does raising corporate taxes lower the cost of gas, the cost of a used car, and the cost of food for average Americans?

miss. Jean-Pierre: So, look, I think we encourage those who have done very well – right? – especially those who care about climate change, to support a fairer tax – an unchanging tax law – that does not impose on manufacturing workers, policemen, and builders a higher percentage of their earnings; That the luckiest people in our nation — and we don’t let them — stand in the way of lowering energy costs and fighting this existential problem, if you think of that as an example, and supporting basic collective bargaining rights as well. right? This is also important.
But look, it’s – you know, not – if – without a more fair tax law, which I’m talking about, everything – like manufacturing workers, policemen – you know, it’s not fair for them to have to pay higher taxes than people – Who – they – who pay no taxes at all or hardly do.

While the question focused on inflation, the answer discussed (as it does) climate change and collective bargaining – topics that are only tangentially related to the price of goods.

liberal elitism

The typical leftist response to voter anxieties occurred in the American heartland nearly a decade and a half ago. While campaigning on a rural Iowa farm in July 2007, Barack Obama attempted to “empathize” with the crowd by asking a rhetorical question: “Has anyone gone to Whole Foods recently and seen what they’re getting paid for arugula? I mean, they’re charging too much.” money for these things.” The note at a time when there was no Chi Chi Grocery (which some call a “full paycheck”) operate a facility in Hook State.

Democrats have yet to show much evidence about the needs or lifestyle of ordinary voters in the years since. This position would go a long way toward explaining the possible elimination of the party in November.

Leave a Comment